bland?
Here is an interesting find by Lloyd Moritz over at ChOGBlog. It talks about Charles Shultz's roots in the Church of God. This post brings up an interesting question. In an EPIC world {Experiential, Participatory, Image rich, and Connective}[Len Sweat], are we as ChOGers ill-equipt to relate to the world around us? How creative and artisitc is your congregation? We've got a few people. Our building isn't, it looks like every other Indiana Limestone church built in the 50s. Except we've added on since then, something that most of those vintage churches have not done.
What's your church's creative score? 1 to 10: 1 being stick figure, 10 being Di Vinci
Is there a difference between your church and your specific area of ministry? Why is that? What would that score be?
What's your church's creative score? 1 to 10: 1 being stick figure, 10 being Di Vinci
Is there a difference between your church and your specific area of ministry? Why is that? What would that score be?
Labels: art, ChOG practice, ChOG theology, creativity
Posted By Randy | |
Permalink 
Dangerous question buddy... :)
Our church is probably a 1. But at least the stick figures are consistent, right?
I heard a great quote today, that your congregation will reflect your influences in ministry... too true. :)
Posted by
Jeremy |
9:27 AM
You're picking on limestone Indiana churches built in the 50's huh! WELL, . . . . i got nothin :\
man the 50's get such bad play don't they
Posted by
Andy |
1:12 PM
i'd say that we've got a 4 on the scale. not passing, but getting a few of the dots in the right place. we've developed a WorshipDesignTeam that meets every 4-5 weeks. we look @ the themes & sermon topics & then build some interactive/visual elements around those themes. but we're still babies in the process.
Posted by
nathan |
3:45 PM